Male Reproductive Medicine & Surgery — Specialty Profile

Exploratory, not prescriptive. This profile blends hard data (pay, match rates, burnout, demographics, each sourced and dated) with generalizations and synthesized opinion about culture and "who fits." It's here to help you get curious and go find out for yourself, not to tell you who to become. Numbers marked ⟳ verify change every year; check the linked source before you quote one. Last reviewed: 2026-08-04.

Also called: andrology, male infertility, male reproductive medicine, sexual medicine, MRMS. A 1–2 year fellowship entered after a urology residency, not a residency you match into from medical school. Organ system: the male reproductive tract, meaning testis, epididymis, vas, prostate, and penis, plus the hormonal axis that runs it.

Subspecialty fellowship of Urology.

The 30-second version

Male reproductive medicine is the half of infertility care that nobody built a specialty around until recently, which is odd given that a male factor contributes in roughly half of infertile couples. The field covers two overlapping territories: male infertility, meaning azoospermia, varicocele, obstruction, and the surgical retrieval of sperm directly from the testis, and sexual medicine, meaning erectile dysfunction, Peyronie's disease, and penile prosthetics. Its signature operation is microdissection testicular sperm extraction, in which the surgeon opens a testis under high-power microscopy and hunts for the small number of tubules still producing sperm in a man whose semen contains none. The work sits in an unusual relationship with reproductive endocrinology on the female side, since the two fields treat one couple from opposite directions and the andrologist's success is often measured by whether an embryologist finds anything usable. The trade at the center of the field: genuinely microsurgical, genuinely high-satisfaction work with an enormous unmet need, done in a field with no board certificate, a fellowship system so loosely organized that fewer than half of programs even join the match, and a job market concentrated in academic centers.

Quick dashboard (details and sources below)


Training after med school	6–7 years (5 yr urology residency + 1–2 yr andrology fellowship)
Total from college start	~14 years (4 undergrad + 4 med school + 5 residency + 1 fellowship)
Training chain	Med school (4) → Urology (5 yr, early AUA match) → 1–2 yr male reproductive medicine fellowship
Competitiveness (as a urology fellowship)	No published rate, and the match is not universal: only about 45% of programs participated in the 2021 AUA andrology match ⟳
Typical full-time pay	No andrology survey line. Parent urology averages ~$564,000 with a median of ~$530,000; academic urology runs ~$455,000 ⟳
Pay vs. parent (general urology)	Likely below, because 93% of programs and most jobs are academic, where urology pay drops about 36% against private practice ⟳
Lifestyle	Outpatient and elective, microsurgical rather than emergent, among the most controllable corners of urology ⟳
Burnout	No subspecialty figure; parent urology is ~49.5%, second-highest on the AMA's 2025 survey ⟳
% women	16.4% of all andrology fellows 1982–2020, rising to 20.7% for those starting from 2010; parent urology 11% practicing ⟳
DO / IMG accessibility	Gated behind urology (~7–8% DO, ~3–4% IMG of matches) ⟳

What they actually do

The field has two halves that most practitioners do together, and a third that some add.

Male infertility is the diagnostic and surgical management of the male partner in an infertile couple. The work starts with semen analysis, hormonal evaluation, and genetic testing, and proceeds through varicocele repair, treatment of obstruction, and sperm retrieval. The defining problem is non-obstructive azoospermia, in which no sperm appear in the ejaculate because production itself has failed, and the defining response is microdissection testicular sperm extraction, in which the testis is opened and searched under the operating microscope for the isolated tubules that are still producing. What is found goes straight to an embryologist for use in ICSI.

Sexual medicine is erectile dysfunction, Peyronie's disease, priapism, and the prosthetic surgery that treats refractory ED. Inflatable penile prosthesis implantation is a defined, high-satisfaction operation with its own literature and its own complication profile, and it is one of the more reliably remunerative procedures in the subspecialty.

Hypogonadism and testosterone management sits across both, and it has become a larger part of practice as direct-to-consumer testosterone clinics have grown, which means a fellowship-trained andrologist frequently spends time undoing what a commercial clinic started, particularly in young men whose fertility was compromised by exogenous testosterone.

Representative procedures: microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microTESE) · microsurgical vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy, meaning vasectomy reversal · microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy · testicular and epididymal sperm aspiration · inflatable and malleable penile prosthesis implantation · surgical correction of Peyronie's disease, including plication, grafting, and implant · sperm retrieval coordinated in real time with an IVF cycle · vasectomy, which is high-volume and often the practice's bread and butter · management of ejaculatory duct obstruction.¹²

A day in the life: outpatient, microsurgical, and organized around other people's calendars. Clinic is heavy on counseling, because a large share of what the andrologist provides is a realistic probability estimate for a couple who have already spent money and hope. The operating days are microscope days, often long single cases, and they are frequently scheduled against an IVF cycle, meaning the retrieval has to happen on the day the female partner's eggs are collected. That coordination with reproductive endocrinology and the embryology laboratory is a structural feature of the job rather than an occasional inconvenience.

The counterpart profile on the other side of the couple is reproductive endocrinology and infertility, and reading the two together is the honest way to understand fertility care, because the money, the infrastructure, and the cultural attention are distributed very unevenly between them.

On call: minimal. Priapism is a genuine urologic emergency and testicular torsion arrives at all hours, but those are covered by the general urology rota. An andrology practice itself is elective.

The training path & time to completion

Medical school (4 yrs) → urology residency (5 yrs, entered through the early AUA match) → 1–2 year male reproductive medicine and surgery fellowship → practice.¹³

The residency is the hard gate. Urology runs its own match, several weeks ahead of the NRMP, and it is competitive: roughly 1.3 to 1.5 applicants per position with about one in four going unmatched, ~7–8% DO and ~3–4% IMG. The parent urology profile covers it.⁴
The fellowship is 1 to 2 years and is not ACGME-accredited. It is endorsed by societies rather than accredited by ACGME.³ There is no American Board of Urology subspecialty certificate in andrology either: ABU certifies two subspecialties, pediatric urology and urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery, and neither one covers this field.⁵
The match exists but is not universal, and this is the single most important structural fact about entering the field. The AUA runs an Andrology Fellowship Match sponsored by the Society for the Study of Male Reproduction, with registration opening in November, applications closing in mid-April, and results in mid-June.³ But a 2022 study in Urology found that only about 45% of andrology programs participated in the 2021 AUA match, with SMSNA endorsing 73% of programs and SSMR 48%.² More than half the field's training positions are filled outside any organized process.
Total from the start of college: about 14 years.

What the loose structure means in practice. A field where endorsement is split across two societies and fewer than half of programs use the common match is a field where the quality and content of training vary substantially, and where knowing people matters more than a rank list. There is real microsurgical training available in it, and there is also the possibility of a year that does not deliver the volume you needed. If you are considering this path, case logs and graduate destinations are the questions to ask, and they matter more here than in an accredited fellowship where a floor is enforced.

The field is small and overwhelmingly academic. From 1982 through 2020 the entire national output was 324 fellows, and 93% of programs are affiliated with an academic institution.² That is roughly eight fellows a year across four decades.

How competitive is it?

No match rate is published, and given that most programs do not participate in the match, no meaningful rate could be. Any figure you encounter is invented.

What can be said with sources:

The severe filter is the urology residency, which is one of medicine's harder matches and runs early, so applicants who miss it have limited fallback in the same cycle.⁴
Fellowship supply is not the constraint. Around 17 programs are listed by SSMR, and the historical output is about eight fellows a year, against roughly 400 urology residents finishing annually.²⁶ Interest, not capacity, sets the number.
The unstructured process cuts both ways. Without a universal match, a well-connected applicant can arrange a position directly, which advantages people with mentorship and disadvantages everyone else. That is the opposite of what a match is designed to prevent, and it is the opposite of the intent.

The honest read. Nobody is fighting you for an andrology fellowship. If you want the field and you have a mentor, you can very likely train in it. The competitive event in your career was matching urology, and the meaningful risk afterward is training somewhere that does not give you the microsurgical volume the work requires.

Board: none. Primary certification is the American Board of Urology, whose two subspecialty certificates are pediatric urology and urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery.⁵

Compensation — the robust version

No survey reports an andrology line. Physician Side Gigs, which surveyed urologists between mid-2023 and mid-2024, states directly that its dataset was not large enough to break out salary differences by subspecialty, and no other published source does better.⁶

The parent anchor is well measured, and its internal structure is the story. Across 52 full-time urologists surveyed 2023–24: average $564,000, median $530,000, with a range from $220,000 to $1.2 million. The corpus figure for general urology is $535,000–$560,000.⁴⁶ ⟳

The splits inside that matter far more than the headline:

Cut	Figure
Group private practice	$622,000
Non-academic hospital	$621,000
Academic hospital	$455,000
W-2 employee	$500,000
Owner or partner	$717,000

⁶ ⟳

Academic urology pays roughly 36% less than group private practice, and owners earn about 43% more than employees. Those two gaps dwarf anything a subspecialty choice does on its own.

Applied to this field, stated as inference. With 93% of andrology programs academically affiliated and most graduates entering academic or academically affiliated practice, the andrologist's realistic anchor is closer to the $455,000 academic figure than to the $622,000 private one.²⁶ Choosing this subspecialty is, in compensation terms, mostly a choice to work in the setting that pays least, and the fellowship year is spent buying entry into it.

The counterweights are real but partial. Vasectomy is high-volume, quick, office-based, and well reimbursed for the time it takes, and a busy vasectomy practice is a genuine economic engine. Penile prosthesis implantation is a defined, well-compensated operation. Some andrologists build cash-pay practices around men's health, testosterone, and sexual medicine, which is the one route in this field to private-practice economics, and it comes with its own reputational questions inside the specialty.

The structural problem. Male infertility care is poorly covered by insurance in much of the United States, and coverage for the female partner is often better than for the male. A field whose central service is inconsistently reimbursed is a field with a constrained income ceiling, and that is a substantial part of why so few urologists do it.

Limited-data caveat: no MGMA, Doximity, Medscape, or Physician Side Gigs line exists for andrology, and the survey above explicitly declines to break out subspecialties on a sample of 52. The parent figures are sourced; the academic-weighting inference is mine. ⟳

Lifestyle

Among the more controllable lives in a specialty already known for reasonable hours.

Parent urology is moderate by surgical standards at roughly 45 to 56 hours a week with strong schedule control, which is one reason urology is a popular target despite its competitiveness.⁴
Andrology is the elective end of that. Clinic and scheduled microsurgery, with no inpatient service to run and no oncologic follow-up burden.
Call is general urology call, taken as a departmental obligation. Priapism and torsion are real emergencies, but they arrive through the shared rota rather than from your own practice.
The one scheduling wrinkle is genuine. Sperm retrieval timed to an IVF cycle is not movable, because the female partner's egg retrieval is not movable. That means some cases land where they land, occasionally on short notice and occasionally on a weekend.
Geographic flexibility is limited. The field needs an IVF program and an embryology laboratory to work alongside, which puts it in cities with fertility infrastructure. General urology can be practiced almost anywhere; a dedicated male fertility practice cannot.

Lifestyle rating: 4/5. Elective, outpatient, low-call microsurgery, with deductions for IVF-driven scheduling and a narrow geographic map.

Wellbeing — the part to take seriously

No andrology-specific wellbeing data exists. The parent field's number is striking and needs handling carefully.

Urology carries roughly 49.5% burnout, the second-highest of any specialty on the AMA's 2025 survey, behind emergency medicine at 49.8% and ahead of hematology/oncology at 49.3%, against an all-physician average of 41.9%. The parent profile calls this the field's paradox: moderate hours and strong schedule control alongside one of the worst burnout figures in medicine. Name the survey when you quote it — Medscape's 2024 report is a different instrument with a different baseline, and puts urology at 49% against a 49% average, which is mid-table.⁴ The drivers usually named are administrative load, high patient volume, and the emotional content of oncology and incontinence care rather than raw hours. ⟳

How much of that transfers here is genuinely unclear, and the honest answer is that nobody has measured it. The features of andrology practice point in a better direction: no cancer follow-up, no inpatient service, elective scheduling, and a patient population who are mostly young and otherwise well. Treat the parent figure as a ceiling rather than an estimate.

The distinctive emotional load is failure with a specific shape. MicroTESE does not always find sperm, and when it does not, the couple's biological options end in that operating room on that day. There is no next line of therapy. Delivering that outcome, repeatedly, to people who have spent years and often large sums getting to it, is the hard part of the job, and it is a different kind of hard from oncology, because the loss is of a future rather than of a life.

The compensating satisfaction is unusually concrete. A vasectomy reversal or a successful retrieval produces a child. Practitioners in the field describe that as an uncommonly clean form of professional meaning, and the follow-up photographs are a known feature of these clinics.

Two frictions. The first is stigma: male infertility and sexual dysfunction are subjects many patients arrive ashamed of, and building a practice means undoing that in every consultation. The second is the commercial fringe: direct-to-consumer testosterone and men's-health clinics operate in the same space with a fraction of the training, and fellowship-trained andrologists spend real energy correcting their consequences and distinguishing themselves from them.

Who's in the field (demographics)

Unusually for a small subspecialty, this one has been measured, because a 2022 study reconstructed the entire fellowship cohort back to 1982.

Women: 16.4% of all andrology fellows from 1982 to 2020, rising from 8.1% among those who began before 2010 to 20.7% among those starting in 2010 or later.² Parent urology runs 11% women practicing against roughly 42% of the 2025 matched applicant cohort, so both the parent and the subspecialty are feminizing from a very low base.⁴ ⟳
Faculty lag the fellows. Only 20% of andrology programs employed a female andrology faculty member, so trainees frequently learn in a division with no woman on the faculty.² ⟳
Career paths do not differ much by gender. 54.5% of women pursued academia against 45.5% of men, a difference the study found not statistically significant, and men and women were about equally likely to advertise an exclusively andrologic practice at 65.4% and 61.4%.²
DO and IMG: no subspecialty figures. Gated behind urology at roughly 7–8% DO and 3–4% IMG of matches, among the least open entry points in medicine.⁴ ⟳
A note the compensation data forces. In the urologist survey, women averaged $484,000 against $601,000 for men, a 25% gap.⁶ That is a parent-field figure rather than an andrology one, and it is not adjusted for setting, seniority, or hours, but it belongs in front of anyone deciding to enter this specialty. ⟳

Culture, personality & the online stereotypes

Who gravitates here: urology residents who liked microsurgery and did not want oncology. The field draws people interested in physiology and endocrinology as much as in operating, since a large fraction of the work is diagnostic reasoning about an axis rather than cutting. It also selects for comfort with sensitive conversation, because the subject matter is one most patients find difficult to raise. Academic orientation is close to a given at 93% of programs. As always, plenty of people in the field do not fit any single mold.

The stereotypes. Community perception rather than fact, each with a kernel and an unfair edge:

"The vasectomy guys." Vasectomy is genuinely high-volume in these practices and genuinely pays the bills. It is also a fifteen-minute office procedure, and reducing a microsurgical subspecialty to it is like describing dermatology as moles.
"Half of infertility, a tenth of the attention." Not a stereotype so much as an accurate complaint the field makes about itself. Male factor contributes in roughly half of infertile couples, and the infrastructure, insurance coverage, and cultural attention are overwhelmingly on the female side.
"A fellowship with no board and no match." Factually correct on both counts, and the more pointed version adds that fewer than half of programs even join the match that does exist.²⁵
"It shades into the testosterone-clinic business." A real tension. Men's health has a large commercial sector with weak clinical standards, and academic andrologists are often distinguishing themselves from it. Fellowship-trained practice and the direct-to-consumer market are genuinely different things, but they share a waiting room in the public mind.

What people say online (synthesized and paraphrased, not quotes): across trainee and physician forums, andrology reads as the subspecialty people choose for the surgery and the meaning rather than for the return. The recurring practical warning is financial: posters note that academic andrology sits at the bottom of urology's pay distribution while general urology and urologic oncology sit far above it, and that the fellowship year buys entry to the lower-paying setting. A second thread concerns the training system, with repeated complaints that program quality varies widely, that the match is optional, and that applicants are effectively negotiating individually. A third is about microsurgical volume, where the consensus advice is to ask directly how many microTESE and vasovasostomy cases a fellow does, because the numbers vary by an order of magnitude between programs. The overall tone is protective of the field and frustrated on its behalf.

Voices from the field. Paraphrased from published sources, with links to the originals:

A 2022 Urology study reconstructed the andrology fellowship landscape and found a total of 324 fellows trained between 1982 and 2020, women rising from 8.1% to 20.7% of the cohort across that period, only 20% of programs with a female andrology faculty member, 93% of programs academically affiliated, SMSNA endorsing 73% of programs and SSMR 48%, and only 45% participating in the 2021 AUA match.²
The AUA administers an Andrology Fellowship Match sponsored by SSMR on the same platform as its pediatric urology, endourology, and urologic oncology matches, with registration opening in November and results in mid-June.³
Physician Side Gigs' urologist survey, covering mid-2023 to mid-2024, reports academic urology at $455,000 against $622,000 in group private practice and $717,000 for owner-partners, and states explicitly that its sample was too small to break out subspecialties.⁶

Why people choose it / why people leave

Why choose it: genuine microsurgery, with an operating microscope and technique that rewards a career of refinement · outcomes that produce children, which is about as concrete as professional meaning gets · an enormous unmet need, since male factor contributes in roughly half of infertile couples and the trained workforce is tiny · elective, outpatient, low-call practice inside a surgical specialty · a physiologic and endocrine intellectual base, not only an operative one · a small enough field that you can know it and be known in it.

Why leave or avoid it: the compensation, since 93% of programs are academic and academic urology pays about 36% below group private practice · no ABU subspecialty certificate and no ACGME accreditation · a fellowship system where fewer than half of programs use the match and training quality varies widely · poor and inconsistent insurance coverage for male infertility care, which constrains the whole field · geographic concentration around IVF infrastructure · the specific weight of a failed retrieval, which ends a couple's biological options in one operation.

Best fit if: microsurgery was the thing you wanted more of in residency · you like endocrine and physiologic reasoning · you want an elective outpatient surgical practice with almost no call · you are comfortable with sensitive conversations and with patients who arrive ashamed · you want academic practice and have made peace with what it pays.

Not for you if: you want urology's income ceiling, which is in private practice and oncology · you need a board certificate · you would find an unaccredited fellowship with no standardized curriculum unacceptable · you need geographic freedom · repeatedly delivering an irreversible negative result would erode you.

The FLI angle — Male reproductive medicine for first-gen, low-income & immigrant students

Where it fits FLI realities well:

PSLF fits this path unusually well, because the field is overwhelmingly academic and academic medical centers are qualifying employers. With 93% of programs academically affiliated and most graduates staying in that world, plus five residency years and a fellowship year counting toward the 120 payments, this is a strong forgiveness case.² Given that the field also pays least within urology, forgiveness is the lever that matters most here.
The income is still very good in absolute terms. Academic urology at roughly $455,000 is a life-changing figure by any FLI measure, even though it is the low end of its own specialty.⁶
The fellowship is not a barrier. Nobody is competing you out of this field. If you reach the end of a urology residency wanting it, you can very likely train in it.
The patient population includes people the system serves badly. Male infertility care is inconsistently covered and unevenly distributed, and men who cannot afford a cash-pay fertility workup mostly do not get one. A physician who understands that from the inside is doing something the field needs.

Risks to name honestly:

The barrier is the urology match, and it is severe and early. Roughly 1.3 to 1.5 applicants per position, about one in four unmatched, ~7–8% DO and ~3–4% IMG, and results arriving weeks before the NRMP, which changes how you have to plan a backup.⁴ Reaching this subspecialty means winning that first, and the research and away-rotation costs of doing so are real.
This is the lowest-paid corner of a well-paid specialty, and the gap is structural rather than negotiable. Academic at $455,000 against group private at $622,000 and owner-partner at $717,000 is a difference of a quarter of a million dollars a year at the extremes.⁶ Over a career, against a median physician debt burden, that is the single most important number on this page for an FLI student. It does not make the field wrong. It makes it a decision that has to be made with the arithmetic in front of you rather than after the fact.
The unstructured fellowship system rewards connections, which is precisely the resource FLI applicants tend to have least of. With fewer than half of programs in the match, the practical advice is to identify an andrologist early in residency and build the relationship deliberately, because the alternative is negotiating from outside a network.
Geography is constrained by where fertility infrastructure exists.

Bottom line for FLI: a field with real meaning, real microsurgery, and an unmet need that is not going away, attached to the lowest-paying setting in its parent specialty and an entry process that runs on relationships. The PSLF fit is genuinely strong and partly offsets the pay. Go in having done the arithmetic against general urology, and start building the mentorship relationship in your first or second year of residency rather than your fourth.

Fun facts

Male factor contributes in roughly half of infertile couples, and the entire national fellowship output between 1982 and 2020 was 324 physicians.²
The signature operation is a search. MicroTESE opens the testis and hunts under high magnification for the few seminiferous tubules still producing sperm, in a man whose ejaculate contains none.
Only about 45% of andrology programs joined the AUA match in 2021, with SMSNA endorsing 73% of programs and SSMR 48%, so the field's own societies do not fully agree on which programs count.²
The American Board of Urology certifies two subspecialties, pediatric urology and urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery. Andrology, endourology, and urologic oncology have no certificate at all.⁵
The scheduling is dictated by someone else's ovaries. A sperm retrieval timed to an IVF cycle happens on the day the female partner's eggs are collected, which is not a movable date.
Testosterone is a contraceptive. Exogenous testosterone suppresses the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis and can shut down sperm production, which is why andrologists spend real clinical time on young men who started it at a commercial clinic.

Sources

Clinical scope, procedures, and the two-halves structure of the field (male infertility and sexual medicine), including microTESE, microsurgical vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy, subinguinal varicocelectomy, penile prosthesis implantation, and Peyronie's surgery. Society for the Study of Male Reproduction — Information for Professionals / Andrology and Male Infertility Fellowship Opportunities, which lists the field's fellowship programs (17 named, including Cleveland Clinic, Weill Cornell, Northwestern, Stanford, UCLA, Miami, Utah, Washington, Baylor-affiliated and others). https://ssmr.org/professionals/andrology.aspx and https://ssmr.org/professionals/fellowship-opportunities.aspx (accessed 2026). ↩ ↩²
The fellowship landscape, measured. "Current Landscape of Andrology Fellowship Programs and the Effect of Gender on Post-Fellowship Practice Patterns," Urology, August 2022 — programs identified through AUA, SSMR, and SMSNA websites; SMSNA endorsed 73% of programs and SSMR 48%, while only 45% of all programs participated in the 2021 AUA match; 324 fellows identified from 1982 to 2020, of whom 16.4% were women, rising from 8.1% (began before 2010) to 20.7% (began 2010 or later); 20% of programs employed female andrology faculty; 93% of programs were affiliated with an academic institution; 54.5% of women versus 45.5% of men pursued academia (not statistically significant); 65.4% of men and 61.4% of women advertised an exclusively andrologic practice. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35577106/ ⟳ ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶ ↩⁷ ↩⁸ ↩⁹ ↩¹⁰ ↩¹¹ ↩¹² ↩¹³
Match administration and timeline. American Urological Association — Specialty Match Timelines: the Andrology Fellowship Match is sponsored by SSMR and run on the AUA's medmatch platform, with registration opening November 10, 2025, program withdrawal deadline December 15, 2025, application deadline April 15, 2026, rank list period April 15 to May 7, 2026, and match results June 12, 2026. The AUA runs parallel matches for pediatric urology (Society for Pediatric Urology), endourology (Endourological Society), and urologic oncology (SUO), and applicants may not participate in more than one simultaneously. https://www.auanet.org/meetings-and-education/for-residents/urology-and-specialty-matches/specialty-match-timelines (accessed 2026). ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴
Parent-field figures for urology. Typical comp ~$535k–$560k with a working range of ~$360k to $650k–$700k+, moderate hours of ~45–56/week with strong schedule control, and the separate early AUA residency match whose results land in late January or early February, roughly six weeks ahead of the NRMP, at ~1.3–1.5 applicants per position with about one in four unmatched: see the urology profile on this site. Burnout: the four percentages in the wellbeing section are the AMA's. AMA, Organizational Biopsy 2025 (~19,000 physician responses across 38 states, collected in 2025 by 106 health systems) — urological surgery 49.5%, second-highest of the nine specialties it names, behind emergency medicine at 49.8% and ahead of hematology/oncology at 49.3%, against a 41.9% all-physician average. https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/physician-health/these-9-physician-specialties-report-highest-burnout-rates The labeled contrast: Medscape's Physician Burnout & Depression Report 2024, n=9,226, fielded July–October 2023, is a different instrument on a different baseline, and puts urology at 49% against an all-physician average of 49%, which is mid-table rather than second-highest; emergency medicine leads that table at 63%. Medscape is paywalled and returns HTTP 402, so it reaches this page through two independent relays that agree on the edition, the instrument and every row — Healthgrades Pro (https://resources.healthgrades.com/pro/the-most-and-least-burned-out-physicians-by-specialty) and Advisory Board (https://www.advisory.com/daily-briefing/2024/01/31/physician-burnout). The two baselines differ by seven points, they never belong in the same sentence, and a cross-specialty rank has to name its survey, which is why the body names the AMA on every one of the four figures. Women in practice: AAMC, "Women are changing the face of medicine in America" (2022 data), https://www.aamc.org/news/women-are-changing-face-medicine-america, which puts urology at 11% for 2022, up from 4% in 2004. Corrected 2026-08-17: the demographics bullet and the dashboard both said "~12% women practicing" where this footnote and the AAMC page itself say 11%. The AAMC specialty table's last row reads "Urology | 4% | 11%." One point, no argument moves, and the right number was already sitting in this footnote. Swept 2026-08-17: 11% practicing, of the active urology workforce on AAMC's 2022-data specialty table, is the value all five urology profiles now state. This page was already right and is unchanged. The AUA's own 2024 Census puts the workforce at about 12%, a later vintage on a different instrument and within a point of AAMC; it is named on the urology profile rather than repeated here. Women in training: ACGME, Data Resource Book, Academic Year 2024-2025, Table C.21, https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/publicationsbooks/2024-2025_acgme_databook_document.pdf, which puts urology residents at 36.1%. Two of the figures here sit outside the sources above. The ~42% is women among 2025 matched applicants, a different measure from ACGME's 36.1% of residents in training, and the two should not be read as one. And urology runs its own AUA match rather than the NRMP's, so the ~7–8% DO and ~3–4% IMG figures are not in the NRMP report this site cites for every other field; they are left attributed to the urology profile until someone opens the AUA's own results. Corrected 2026-08-17: this footnote cited Medscape alone for burnout while the body quoted four AMA percentages, so four load-bearing figures reached the reader with a citation pointing at the other instrument, and the footnote's own correction note still described a Medscape-versus-AMA mix-up the body had already fixed. A later pass reading only this footnote would have concluded the body needed repair, or repaired it back to Medscape. The AMA is now cited for the figures it supplies and Medscape is kept as the labeled contrast. The relay count also read "three independent relays" while naming two. ⟳ ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶ ↩⁷ ↩⁸
Board structure. ABMS, American Board of Urology board page: under the heading "Subspecialties" it lists two, Pediatric Urology and Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery. Neither covers andrology, and pediatric urology requires 24 months of accredited fellowship training. https://www.abms.org/board/american-board-of-urology/ (accessed 2026-08-17). Corrected 2026-08-17: this footnote and three places in the body said pediatric urology was the only ABU subspecialty certificate. ABMS lists two. The exclusivity claim came out of the training bullet, the Board line and a fun fact; the load-bearing half is unchanged, since neither certificate covers andrology and the field still has no board of its own. The footnote also carried no URL and rested on "Society for Pediatric Urology and AUA fellowship materials," which cannot enumerate what ABU certifies; it now cites ABMS directly. ⟳ ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴
Compensation. Physician Side Gigs — average urologist salary survey, covering mid-2023 to mid-2024, n = 52 full-time urologists: average $564,000, median $530,000, range $220,000–$1,200,000; group private practice $622,000, non-academic hospital $621,000, academic hospital $455,000 (36% below private practice); W-2 employees $500,000 against owners and partners $717,000 (43% higher); female urologists $484,000 against male $601,000 (25% higher); sign-on bonuses averaging $45,000 for the 45% who received one; 26 vacation days on average. The survey states explicitly that the dataset was not large enough to assess salary differences by subspecialization. Checked 2026-08-17: the 36% is the survey's own stated figure, quoted verbatim — "Academic hospital employees reported 36% lower salaries than colleagues working in group private practice and for non-academic hospitals." Its own pair of averages implies about 27% ($455,000 against $622,000), so the survey's percentage and its dollar figures disagree; both are reproduced here as published. https://www.physiciansidegigs.com/average-urologist-salary ⟳ ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶ ↩⁷ ↩⁸ ↩⁹

Researched with AI assistance and reviewed by hand. How this site is made